Recent CIPD research accuses learning and development professionals of hanging on to “outdated” methods, such as classroom training.
But before ditching this in favour of what might be perceived as more flexible technological approaches, it is worth considering some of the benefits of the ‘classroom’ learning approach.
E-learning has long appeared to be on the cusp of dominating employee training, as it provides a platform that cannot be beaten for convenience and affordability and many organisations have incorporated it into their offering for that reason.
But many still value classroom training. It offers a personal interaction with a learning facilitator, networking with other participants and colleagues and can therefore be dynamic and thought provoking.
In fact many people simply learn better in a classroom setting. Most of us thrive on discussing a topic with other people, working through real life work issues and exploring potential solutions. Typing a message or post to somebody isn’t the same as verbalising a point of view and having to learn the skill s of actively listening to others, challenging and questioning, receiving feedback and gaining acceptance and agreement. The classroom setting allows for real time discussion and provides interaction that isn’t easily duplicated, even with the most advanced of technology.
And when classroom training is tailored to the organisation, it brings a peer group together and ensures a consistency of approach and an opportunity for collaborative working and team building, which you just can’t get with many other learning interventions.
When asked in the survey what methods are most likely to work, most learning and development professionals pointed towards training that is integrated into the normal course of their jobs. And this of course is the key point. No learning intervention works unless it is relevant, meaningful and critically that it is reinforced back in the workplace. Half of respondents (52 per cent) said that “in-house development programmes” were amongst the most effective ways of delivering training, while almost as many (46 per cent) cited “coaching by line managers”.
The “coaching by line managers” is a good example of where online learning would not be effective. Ensuring line managers have the skills to coach effectively is key to getting results from coaching and these skills are best developed through face to face interaction and practicing with others.
Labelling classroom training as outdated is a sweeping and ultimately unhelpful comment. It depends on how it is used and how it is supported back in the workplace. The interaction it provides is not easily replicated with any other form of learning and for that reason alone, it will always have a place in L and D provision.
For some pointers on how a tailored approach with pre and post course support can bring tangible results to your business click here.



